Effect of Penalties on Promotion – Role of Department Promotion Committee Guidelines on treatment of effect of penalties on promotion
DoPT OM on the Guidelines on treatment of effect of penalties on promotion
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public and Training
(Department of Personnel and Training)
North Block, New Delhi – 110 011
November 21, 2016
Sub: Guidelines on treatment of effect of penalties on promotion – role of Departmental Promotion Committee
The Department of Personnel & Training vide its OM of even number dated 28.4.2014 issued instructions on the above subject. Paragraph 7(d), 7(f) and 7(g) of the said OM provides as follows:
If the official under consideration is covered under any of the three condition mentioned in paragraph 2 of OM dated 14.9.1992, the DPC will assess the suitability of Government servant along with other eligible candidates without taking into consideration the disciplinary case / criminal prosecution pending. The assessment of the DPC including ‘unfit’ for promotion and the grading awarded are kept in a sealed cover. [Paragraph 2.1 of DoPT OM dated 14.9.1992]
If any penalty is imposed on the Government servant as a result of the disciplinary proceedings or if he / she is found guilty in the criminal prosecution against him / her, the findings of the sealed cover / covers shall not be acted upon. His / her case for promotion may be considered by the next DPC in the normal course and having regard to the penalty imposed on him / her [paragraph 3.1 of DoPT OM dated 14.9.1992].
In assessing the suitability of the officer on whom a penalty has been imposed, the DPC will take into account the circumstances leading to the imposition of the penalty and decide whether in the light of general service record of the officer and the fact of imposition of penalty, the officer should be considered for promotion. The DPC, after due consideration, has authority to assess the officer as ‘unfit’ for promotion. However, where the DPC considers that despite the penalty the officer is suitable for promotion, the officer will be actually promoted only after the currency of the penalty is over [paragraph 13 of DoPT OM dated 10.4.1989].
2. Questions have been raised by the Ministries and Departments asking whether this is applicable in the case of ‘Censure‘ also. In this regard, it is reiterated that paragraphs 7(d), 7(f) and 7(g) cited above are applicable in all the recognized penalties under CCS (CCA) Rules including the minor penalty of Censure as well for which no currency has been prescribed, it would mean that as per para 7(g), if the DPC considers the officer fit for promotion notwithstanding the award of censure, he / she can be promoted without referring to the currency of penalty.
Related to Your Search:
- Guidelines on treatment of effect of penalties on promotion – role of Departmental Promotion Committee
- CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 – Clarification regarding effect of warning, censure etc on promotion
- Railway Board Orders – Determination of date of increment after expiry of duration of penalties of withholding of increments/reduction to lower stage imposed for less than a year regarding
- Determination of date of increment after expiry of duration of penalties of withholding of increments/reduction to lower stage imposed for less than a year regarding – Railway Board Orders
- Guidelines on treatment of effect of penalties on promotion — role of Departmental Promotion Committee
- BPMS – Notional pay fixation after currency of Minor penalty is over in case of ACP / MACP
- Imposition of un-warranted quantum of minor penalty – Railway Board to NFIR
- Dopt Orders: Regulation of pay on imposition of a penalty under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965
- Penalty Proceedings against Central Government Employees