6th pay commission MACP Scheme Jan 2006
Implementation of MACPS w.e.f. 01.01.2006: IRTSA refers 110th report of parliamentary committee to Secretary Finance (Expenditure).
INDIAN RAILWAYS TECHNICAL SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION
No: IRTSA/ CHQ/ MACPS/2022-1
Date:19.04.2022
Secretary Finance (Expenditure),
North Block,
New Delhi – 110001
Respected Sir,
Sub: Implementation of MACPS w.e.f. 01.01.2006.
Ref: 1. Recommendations of 110th report on “Pensioner’s Grievances-Impact of Pension Adalats and Centralized Pensioners Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPENGRAMS)”
MACP for the Central Government Employees
2 Our earlier memorandum dated 15.12.2019 (Copy attached)
- We seek your kind intervention to consider and revise the date of implementation of MACPS w.e.f 1.1.2006 (instead of 1-9-2008) as per the recommendations of 110th report on “Pensioner’s Grievances-Impact of Pension Adalats and Centralized Pensioners Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPENGRAMS)”
- In para 3.35 of 110th report on “Pensioner’s Grievances-Impact of Pension Adalats and Centralized Pensioners Grievance Redress and Monitoring System (CPENGRAMS)” submitted to Parliament on 10th December 2021, it was recommended that, “The Committee feels that DOPPW should pursue the matter of implementation of MACP w.e.f 1st January, 2006 with DoPT as it will give relief to pensioners retiring in the intervening period i.e. from January, 2006 to August, 2008 as all other benefits were given to them from January 2006 as per 6th CPC recommendations”.
- In our earlier memorandum, we have submitted other detailed justifications including that of Judgement given by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India & Hon’ble High Court of Bombay, 6th CPC recommendations for implementation of revised scheme of Pay Bands and Grade Pay as on 01.01.2006 retrospectively and Government’s acceptance of the same, implementation of 6th CPC recommendations on Pay Band, Grade Pay and Dearness Allowance w.e.f.01.01.2006 vide Extraordinary Notification of Resolution No.1/1/2008-I C, dated 29.8.2008, revision of Non Practicing Allowance (NPA) effective from the date an employee drawing pay in the revised scale applicable to him in accordance with the provisions of the Railway Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, i.e. w.e.f. 1.1.2006, etc
- Therefore without diluting the scheme it is requested that MACPS may please be implemented from 1.1.2006 since MACPS is part of pay structure.
Supreme Court Order delaying the effective date of the MACP Scheme w.e.f. 01.01.2006
Thanking you
Yours faithfully,
(Harchandan Singh)
General Secretary, IRTSA
R.S.Rathore says
It is an agony of fate of central govt. pensioners who retired in between 1.1.2006 to 31.8.2008 who have been deprived of their legitimate demands of grant of MACP from 1.1.2006 since they were allowed the benefit of recommendations of 6th CPC from 1.1.2006 yet the benefit of MACP denied in contravention of various court orders including Apex court. The second legitimate demand was the grant of notional pay for the purpose of pensionery benefits to retirees of 30 th June after rendering 12 calendar months service & earning annual increment. These both legitimate demands were approved & recommended to the Dopt. for consideration & issuing necessary orders by the standing committee of the members of parliament yet same have not been found considered so far. The non acceptance of the recommendations of the parliamentary committee as well the various court orders does not seem to be inconsistent with the work ethics . It is therefore, requested that the head of the the nodal administrative agency may be kind enough to look in to the matter & arrange for immediate action in the matter..
SATYA NARAIN SHARMA says
THE DOP&T HAVE BEEN BIASED IN GRANTING MACP BENEFITS FROM 01.01.2006 DESPITE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT IN FAVOUR OF IMPLEMENTATION FROM 01.01.2006. SEPARATELY, HON’BLE SUPREME COURT ALSO RULED THAT IN ORDER TO PREVENT MULTIPLE LITIGATIONS ON SAME ISSUE, GOVT SHOULD IMPLEMENT JUDGEMENTS DELIVERED BY IT UNIFORMLY.
SIMILARLY DOP&T HAVE DENIED BENEFIT OF INCREMENT TO THOSE RETIRED ON 30TH JUNE DESPITE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT FOR GRANT OF ONE ADDITIONAL INCREMENT TO THOSE RETIRING ON 39TH JUNE AFTER COMPLETION OF FULL 12 MONTH SERVICE
DOP&T IS CERTAINLY BIASED AGAINST RETIRED EMPLOYEES